Blog/Authors/Rachel Kim
Rachel Kim
Data & Analytics

Rachel Kim

Data Analytics & Performance Intelligence Lead

Rachel Kim is the person in the room who asks the question no one else thought to ask: "What does the data actually say?" Her work focuses on building measurement frameworks for coaching businesses that go beyond surface-level vanity metrics to surface the leading indicators that predict revenue outcomes weeks or months before they appear on a P&L. Rachel's background is in quantitative research — she spent six years as a data scientist at a growth-stage SaaS company before transitioning to the coaching industry, where she was struck by how few operators were making decisions based on rigorous analysis rather than intuition and anecdote. Her "Coaching Business Intelligence Stack" — a structured approach to tracking acquisition, activation, retention, and referral metrics — has been implemented by over 30 Capital Attention clients. She writes for the Data & Analytics category with the precision of a scientist and the communication skills of a strategist.

Data AnalyticsBusiness IntelligenceKPI ArchitectureRevenue ForecastingMetrics DesignPerformance Tracking

Articles by Rachel

2 articles published
Data & Analytics

The Cohort Conversion Coefficient: Why Your ROAS Lies and Your Lifetime Value Whispers

Stop optimizing for vanity metrics. Discover how to isolate the true financial impact of your marketing by tracking client cohorts, not just ad spend.

Your ROAS is a blunt instrument. It tells you what you spent and what you got back, but not *who* you got back or *how much* they're really worth. This article reveals the Cohort Conversion Coefficient, a proprietary framework for identifying your highest-value client segments and scaling them profitably, without pixel contamination.

April 20, 2026
14 min read
Read Article →
Data & Analytics

The 'King of the Hill' Fallacy: Why Your Ad Data Is Lying to You About Scale

Stop chasing the single 'winning' ad. Your data isn't just underperforming; it's actively misleading you about where true scaling potential lies.

You're spending $4,000+ a month on ads, getting 'itchy' volume, and the numbers from your agency don't quite add up. The problem isn't your offer or your ad spend; it's the fundamental data model you're using to measure performance. Discover why the 'King of the Hill' approach to ad creatives is a statistical trap and how it prevents you from uncovering profitable, scalable buyer segments.

April 20, 2026
12 min read
Read Article →
Back to All Articles